<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Sex Symbols</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/</link>
	<description>Guide to PC computers, peripherals and upgrades.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radeon 2900XT. Photos of retail version - PC Tips World</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Radeon 2900XT. Photos of retail version - PC Tips World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>[...] As you know Radeon 2900XT version is officially released today. Several luckies even already tested it. What can I say? I&#8217;m dissapointed. Even Ruby won&#8217;t save AMD. Video card is similar to Geforce 8800GTS, but costs less (recommended price is $399). It needs more power (215 W) and is more buggy. During tests games exit with errors. I hope AMD will fix problems in future drivers. And now several photos of the 2900XT: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As you know Radeon 2900XT version is officially released today. Several luckies even already tested it. What can I say? I&#8217;m dissapointed. Even Ruby won&#8217;t save AMD. Video card is similar to Geforce 8800GTS, but costs less (recommended price is $399). It needs more power (215 W) and is more buggy. During tests games exit with errors. I hope AMD will fix problems in future drivers. And now several photos of the 2900XT: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMD is almost ready to launch R600 - PC Tips World</title>
		<link>http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>AMD is almost ready to launch R600 - PC Tips World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pctipsworld.com/2007/01/24/video-sex-symbols/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] Do you remember Ruby&#8217;s comparison? Well, according to this post AMD has working model of &#8220;new&#8221; Ruby. But it&#8217;s not main the main spot. AMD has working R600 video cards. It&#8217;s just working prototypes for manufacturers. If manufacturers are happy, customers will be happy too (I hope). Thinking about R600? You must start saving money, if you want to be in the first flight. Because it launches at the beginning of March [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do you remember Ruby&#8217;s comparison? Well, according to this post AMD has working model of &#8220;new&#8221; Ruby. But it&#8217;s not main the main spot. AMD has working R600 video cards. It&#8217;s just working prototypes for manufacturers. If manufacturers are happy, customers will be happy too (I hope). Thinking about R600? You must start saving money, if you want to be in the first flight. Because it launches at the beginning of March [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

